I guess I’ve always had this warped idea about love, and that all the great love stories were the same.  Rick and Ilsa, Sid and Nancy, Gatsby and Daisy, they all just, they just kind of ruined each other.  And not in the fake fifth-grade broken heart kind of way.  They totally fucked up every fiber of each other’s being.  They were magnificently miserable together, but without one another, that was just a massacre. 

im In this day and age it’s a strange thing to grow up as a man. We don’t have the great, life (and generation)-defining wars like our fathers, grandfathers, and so on. You hear a lot about how 20 somethings these days are over-protected, coddled, and a generation of men raised by women. Maybe thats true, I don’t know. What I do know, however, is that we are a generation growing up on these great love stories. We grow up hearing how our parents met, how our grandparents met, and then we turn to literature and film.

I was having a discussion with a friend the other day about novels and our favorite protagonists. When discussing one of my favorite author’s lack of being able to write good female protagonists, it suddenly dawned on me that I couldn’t think of a single literary female protagonist that I enjoyed.

Does this mean I’m sexist? I can’t relate to women? I never really could get into any work that is considered feminist, because there seems to be two trends while dealing with female leads. Either they fit the stereotypes placed on women, or they go so dramatically against them. Feminist literature, in my experiences (yes I’ll admit they are limited), doesn’t pray into gray areas as much. As a result, they are flatter characters. They aren’t as complex and interesting. A lot of male protagonists have character flaws and are three dimensional. They are cynics & romantics. Idealists & pacifists. Masochists & Chauvinists 

sunrise21One of the biggest themes in modernist and contemporary literature is men and their relationship to women. The Great Gatsby, The Sun Also Rises, The Rum Diary, these are all complex, timeless novels. You can even see it today in cult favorites Fight Club and Kiss Me Judas. They have a variety of themes, but at the end of the day they are still about men & women. The effects of women, both devastating and beneficial.

Gatsby aspires to make something of himself to catch the eye of Daisy. Jake Barnes can’t get himself together and with Brett. In Will Christopher Baer’s Kiss Me Judas, Phineous Poe falls for a dangerously destructive Jude after she steals his kidney & leaves him in a bathtub. Sure, it’s an urban legend, but that is just the beginning with these two. 

So if we grow up on these stories of love and unfathomable ruination doesn’t it stand to reason that to be our expectations of love and relationships? I think everybody is looking for somebody to completely devastate them. For good & for bad.

 

kissmejudashcIn my experiences, theres always that one girl that crawls under your skin, seeping into your brain and subconsciousness. They violently cut out little metaphorical chunks of your heart and soul. Sometimes this girl will be fleeting. A drive-by attack. A footnote in the plot of your life. But she’ll still leave her mark. 

Then there is  the girl that makes leaves more than fingerprints on you. She shapes the course of your past, present, and future. You will look back and remember her, you will forever plagued by the psychological effects on you. It could be trust issues. It could be paranoia. It could be the song you can’t listen to, or the city you will never visit again. A distant association that inexplicably fucks you. And then it will make sure you never make the same mistakes twice.

It’s a hard thing to come by a girl who will destroy every little shred of your being. She makes you question your life, your decisions, your vices, and your self. You may do things to her, or yourself, that you never thought you were capable of. You may rise or fall to the occasion. 

Even after time apart, like an old sweater, we can slip and fall back into the same patterns with these women. The hole are still there though. They make us forgo logic, and indulge in them, and who we are when we are with them.  We are aware of the loose, slipping threads, but we also learn how to avoid them. How to deal and cope with them, to wear the sweater to its best use. For good or bad, these women will be the death of us. Most claim to be looking for a savior, most men are looking for a destroyer. 

 

gramercyI’ve covered one happenstance of living with a woman, the bathroom clutter, but today I would like to talk about another annoyance. 

Pillows are great. They are comfy, fluffy, and exactly what you need whether it be after a long day, or just a mid-afternoon crash. They come in all shapes and sizes. Tiny pillows, body pillows, husbands, donuts, back pillows, and so forth. 

Unfortunately for the sake of bed-space, these pillows mass up, eventually taking over a good 51% of your bed. They get further and further down the bed. Sure, you could leaven them untouched and hang out by the lower half of your bed,if you don’t mind contorting or having your feet fall off the bed. Or of course you can opt for pillow removal.

Pillow removal is quite annoying with the half bed of pillows. 

  1. You have to find a place for all the pillows. If you put them on the floor by the bed, this also will make your room look messier than it is, and they just take up precious floor space.
  2. You have to put them back in the morning. Remember what your mother told you. You always have to make sure to make your bed. With a low number of pillows, this becomes much easier. All you have to do is smooth out the sheets, and plop the pillows into place. With more and more pillows. it becomes much more annoying and time consuming. 

Gals, I don’t understand the obsession with pillows. A few pillows are okay. I’m even down with the body pillows. When you are sleeping partner-less, they make a very nice replacement, but I can not fathom the need for more than 4 pillows on a bed.

sexy-art-martini-thumb Yet another one of those lovely double standards about the bar scene. Ladies’ nights & drink specials aren’t enough, but they get bought free drinks. By bartenders, by guys they won’t even indulge, and of course by guys that will spend all night trying to get into their pants. 

Guys don’t get free drink. The free drink for a guy is less believable myth then the Lock Ness Monster. 

Girl’s have it easy. They don’t even have to really acknowledge a guy, and her and her friend might have a free round. Eye batting, flirtatious looks, and giggling don’t even have to factor into the equation. They just have to be. With today’s economic crisis, you ladies should really appreciate all your free rounds. Sure, guys buy you drinks to try and get with you, and that’s what we get, but you don’t even have to indulge us. So really, be thankful for your free drinks.

Cute. It’s a word with many different uses, variants, and meanings. It can be used on a baby, a dog, a girl that is “ok” looking, the guy you have friend zoned, or it can be used in the worst way. The condescending cute. 

Cute is what you hear when a girl isn’t all that into you. But when guys say a girl is “cute” it means something different. Personally, i like  ”cute girls”. Its about looks + personality working in complete unison. A girl is easy on the eyes, and she has a great personality. She isn’t the most amazing looker ever, but she’s still cute. Our “cute” to women is a compliment. 

The condescending cute, however, is another beast. This is when somebody calls you, or something you are doing cute. This isn’t sincere, it’s a form of mockery. When a girl tells me something is “cute” in a mocking way, there is very little I find as irritating or offensive. I would personally rather somebody tell me a long string of obscenities then call me “cute” with that bite to it. It’s patronizing in the form of something you would say to a puppy or small child.

christmas-ornaments1 Since today is Black Friday, the “official” kickoff of the holiday season, I figured I would take a look at one of those little relationship-al conundrums: where to spend the holidays.When your in a relationship, the holidays are kind of one of those things that you want to do as a couple. You don’t want to spend New Years or Christmas apart. 

No matter how long the relationship is progressed, It’s always an awkward conversation. You don’t want to make assumptions, and you definitely don’t want to lean to heavy towards one person’s family. 

So how do you split up the holidays? Well, I suppose it depends on the individual, their feelings about their family/your family, their family’s plans for the certain holdiay. For instance, Thanksgiving has never been a big deal to me. I’m not a big turkey fan, and I usually just have crappy Thanksgivings, so I’d be entirely down for bailing on my family for Thanksgiving. 

Of course the split is a lot easier if you are both from the same area, being able to split the day in half. Morning/Afternoon one place, dinner at another. The pain is when you live in different areas. If you are fairly serious about the relationship, you aren’t going to want to spent the holidays apart. And it always a hassle to deal with where you are going to spend each holiday.

book_jacket_of_twilight1A little movie just came out. It was based off a best-selling young adult book. It had a modest opening box office weekend at 70.5 million. Little phenomenon called, Twilight. 

A love story between a teenage girl, and a vampire. She’s the new girl at school. Let’s take a look at Stephanie Meyer’s genius introduction to our protagonist:

All of the kids here had grown up together-their grandparents had been toddlers together. I would be the new girl from the big city, a curiosity, a freak.Maybe, if I looked like a girl from Phoenix should, I could work this to my advantage. But physically, I’d never fit in anywhere. I should be tan, sporty, blond - a volleyball player, or a cheerleader, perhaps - all the things that go with living in the valley of the sun.

Riveting stuff right there. I’m just going to come out and say this. Twilight is a poorly written, by-the-books vampire/human love story. The unpopular girl falls for a vampire. Of course vampires being the oh so brilliant metaphor for the outcast kids in high school. You see, because she feels like an outcast, and falls in love with a vampire, she wants to become a vampire. But heres the catch, he won’t turn her into a vampire until he marries her. Gee what else do people not want to do until their married? 

I’m not ragging on this story. In fact, 10 years ago, there was another little phenomenon in pop culture. It too had a female protagonist, new girl in school. She also felt like an outcast, wasn’t popular. And, yes, she too fell in love with not one, but two, vampires. Vampires with souls. Vampires who loved her. Only…she didn’t want to become a vampire. The difference being that Buffy The Vampire Slayer was well written, true to life (metaphors aside), and worth the hype it received. The episode Innocence is one of the best written and acted examples of teenage sex. It wasn’t exactly subtle, but it was a good metaphor for how everything changes after having sex with somebody.

Twilight on the other hand, just isn’t well written. It’s a mess of adverbs and adjectives. And then a few sentences wasted trying to explain those adverbs and adjectives. 

I didn’t want to be too early to school, but I couldn’t stay in the house anymore. I donned my jacket - which had the feel of a biohazard suit - and headed out into the rain.

It was just drizzling still, not enough to soak me through immediately as I reached for the house key that was always hidden under the eaves by the door, and locked up. The sloshing of my new waterproof boots was unnerving.

That is what passes for good writing? The problem with people who lean on these books as good books, they usually have few arguments. The story, the writing, and the characters.  I’ve heard that Stephenie Meyer considers her Bella a feminist icon. Sure, she is a feminist icon in the sense that she is dependent on Edward to the point of depression when she isn’t with him. A friend told me that in the third book she has been dating him for a year and still is unable to breathe around him because he is so beautiful. This is a nice role model for tween girls? Oh but wait, it’s not just for tween girls anymore.

According to the LA Times, exit polls showed that 75% of the audiences were females. Although most who watched the movie were under age 25, plenty of adults went as well, with 45% of all viewers being 25 years or older. Thats right. 45% were at least 25.

That right there is the problem I am having. I don’t get how this fad can extend to older women that much. 45% is entirely too much. I suppose Harry Potter made it okay to like young adult literature, but this is just keeping the trend going. So why do girls over the age of 25 flock to this? Is it the escapism? The fantasy?

101040322Vampires are a time tested way to get girls in the seat. Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise, Edward. What is it about a vampire that is so crazy sexy to girls? Is it the intimate nature of the turning? There is something primal and cardinal about the whole sucking blood/exchange of fluids thing. Maybe it is all about the turning them into a vampire. It’s committal, its forever, it’’s one step beyond sex in a carnal marriage. He has turned you into something better. stronger. I guess that really isn’t too empowering from a female point of view. You need the man to do this to you, so you could become like him. And what happens at the expense of becoming a vampire. Sure, you live forever, but you also lose your soul. Ah isn’t that the price of power? Losing your soul. He drains you of your soul and blood, and fills you with promises of eternity and power. Also, your a monster. 

What I find interesting is that when it comes to escapism and childhood fantasies, men and women are worlds apart. With the burgeoning trend of adultalescence in today’s society, it is easy to point the blame at men. We are a generation of over-coddled and even more over-privileged souls. But the trend exists. We get out of college, and we stay home. We meander from job to job. We try to find “ourselves”.. through jobs, money, sexual conquests, backpacking through Europe and Thailand. We look to Star Wars & Indiana Jones. John McLain and James Bond. These are our fantasies. To be bad ass heroes, who drink, who smoke, who get the girl, and save the day.

The books i read when in my teenage years were romantic too. The Great Gatsby. The Sun Also Rises. These are classics, sure. But they are classic tales of romance. Of men and women. Of Love. These love stories also come at a price. All the great women in literature always come between women and bring us to our knees. They ruin us. 

Girls. Well. The Twilight effect on girls is something of another animal. High School Musical & Twilight are the big “tween” (thats preteen/teen girl) fads  that are over-extending themselves into girls in their 20s and beyond.  They go to trashy teen romance and sexual fantasies of vampires. Is it romantic? Sure. Is it romantic in the sense of Gatsby and Daisy? Hardly. These are teenage girls fighting teenage emotions and feelings. Social awkwardness, anxiety, and first love. These are important stepping stones, sure, but they shouldn’t be what you cling to. 

I don’t really get the rose painted glasses people have in regard to high school. It’s a shitty time, and the majority of people have a bad experience, but we all go back in our older years and want to be 15 again. We want to keep that twilight going. We want to be young, we want to stay in love. We want our vampires, our heroes, and our demons. These twilight fanatics are clinging to a fantasy, a flawed view on romance and youth and the undead. They want the forbidden fruit (as so cleverly displayed on the book cover).

Let’s face it, dating is a bitch. The first date is a mess of nerves, awkward conversation, and guessing games about what each moment means. You get to the end of that first date, and it’s the moment of truth. Do or die. In a lot of ways, the continuation relationship hinges on this first kiss. Sure, you could play it cool, pansy out, and put it off until the next time, but that will only lead to another evening with just as much pressure. 

The moment leading up to that first kiss is the culmination of everything you are both thinking and feeling up until that moment. The nervousness, the confusion, the lust, it all comes to a head at that moment. You have spent the evening with small talk and witty one-liners, when you finally get to the door. When you get here, it’s the home stretch, you both know its coming, it’s just a matter of when. And then it happens. It’s not always fireworks, heck, sometimes it isn’t even good, but after that you know. 

Either you have chemistry or don’t. You could have sparkling conversation, but that doesn’t mean a damn if you don’t have any spark on that level. On the very best occasions you get the cloudy head, and just know that you’re screwed. You know this because that few hours of over-thinking and second guessing, that was just the start. But in that moment, you can’t even think. You just enjoy the pure, unadulterated awesomeness of it.

772798_toe_socksToe socks are one of those female choices that simply just boggles my mind. I will never, ever understand toe socks. They are like gloves for your feet. Who wants gloves on their feet? Mobility is hard enough when wearing gloves (which is why I tend to stick to the ones that stop at the fingers), do you really want to do that to your toes? 

I suppose there might be the comfort argument, as I don’t really know who would find toe socks fashionable. How much comfort is there really compared to regular socks. Do the added slots for the toes added an extra layer of comfort? The between toe areas are now nestled against fabric, as opposed to your other feet. Whatever happened to body warmth? Doesn’t it stand to reason that your other toes should help keep each toe just as warm?

Toe socks are unattractive, and just plain creepy.

aaaaasktnsuaaaaaaaogggI’m going to start off by saying that I have nothing against marriage. If a committed couple wants to take the plunge, God bless ‘em. I also want to say that I have nothing against people getting married “too young”. That is not what I’m talking about.

What I am talking about is a recent happening in a lot of the post-college aged couples I know. Growing up, you hear a lot of things about college, and your life after. You get tossed out of dorm rooms, and the confines of your parent’s house and you enter “the real world”. Its scary, it’s new, and your 21 years of grade school, middle school, high school, and college, education is supposed to prepare you for it. Except, it really doesn’t. The fairy tale rarely happens how it’s been pitched to you growing up.

Sometime during college, I started hearing murmurs about how everybody gets married after college, because it’s the next step. After that comes babies, and so on and so forth. When I got out of college, it started to happen. I heard vague tales of the kid from my sociology class who got engaged. Then it spread. These couples became less vague acquaintances, and they hit closer to home. Friends of friends, friends, exs, and even more acquaintances. It is an epidemic that is spreading like wildfire. All the stories and warnings I heard, I didn’t pay attention, and now it’s springing up with almost every couple I know, regardless of how long they’ve actually been dating.

One girl I know, in the span of the last 8 months, got out of a multiple-year relationship, started seeing somebody, got engaged, and started wedding plans for 2010. That’s right 2010. Twice the time that she has actually been involved with her fiance. When I tell people this story, their first reaction is always “yeah, like that’ll happen”. I know another couple who have been engaged, and half of them has been debating whether or not keeping the relationship going since the onset. So why the sudden dash to get engaged. Is it because everybody else is doing it? Is it because thats what we were told that we were supposed to happen after college? 

Let’s take a look at some statistics I pulled off of http://divorcerate.org 

Age at marriage for those who divorce in America

Age Women Men
Under 20 years old 27.6% 11.7%
20 to 24 years old 36.6% 38.8%
25 to 29 years old 16.4% 22.3%
30 to 34 years old 8.5% 11.6%
35 to 39 years old 5.1% 6.5%

 

Notice the age rate with the highest divorce rate? College aged kids. After the age of 25, there is a significant drop off.

Am I saying that all kids in their early 20s shouldn’t get married? By all means no. Not all of them are caught up in the romantic rush of new relationships that are still in the Honeymoon period, or locking down their college sweetheart. One of the strongest couples I know just got engaged during the middle of this marriage epidemic. The difference here is that I didn’t respond, “Wow, really?”, my response was, “It’s about time.” True, they are some of my best friends, but they are also the couple I look to as a rock. On my jaded, bitter days, I look at them for an example of a couple that just works. They make it look easy, when the rest of us are out there fighting the good fight. They are both in that age-bracket, but there is not a single doubt in my mind that their marriage will stand the test of time. 

I know a lot of couples that age will have the naivety of a high-school couple two weeks into their courtship. They will say, “Oh no, that’s not us! We aren’t like that. You just don’t get it!”. I’m not going to lie, I’ve been in that group. I have gone ring shopping on more than one occasion, for more than just one girlfriend. I just think a lot of couples in their twenties do it because of it is what expected, because it is a grasp at what they have now, and just because they hope they can make it. It’s just a depressing thing to realize that half of them probably won’t make it more than five years.

powers_sylar_frozen_sword1 There is a stealthy danger when you are with a girl. It can happen anytime, anywhere. You never expect it, and it always goes pulsing through your veins. It chills you to the bone. You will be sitting there in bed, watching TV, or reading a book. Oh, sure you’ll be all comfy and cozy together, and then it happens. She puts her cold feet on you. Maybe just on your feet, or running up your leg. But it happens, and it sucks. 

Sadly, there is nothing you can really ever do to prepare for this, or even to prevent it. This affliction happens world-wide and effects males constantly.

And of course it isn’t limited just to cold feet, cold hands are a much more common occurrence. You will be relaxed, thinking your girl is reaching up the back of your shirt as comfort, or to hold your hand because she adores your touch, but no, it’s because she wants you to warm her up.

This is one of those love/hate things about coupledom. Sure, it’s nice to warm somebody up, and it’s nice for somebody to be depending on your warmth, both literally and figuratively, but like all the good things in life, you have to suffer for it. Their warmth comes at the expense of yours. A cold hand or foot is a bitch to experience. It makes you alert, and it chills you. Whether it’s on the back/neck/anywhere it just isn’t really a pleasant experience. The good of it is a delayed reaction that you only realize after the shock and awe attack.

Next Page »